Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39765 (AP)

R. Narayana, v. The State of A.P.,

WP/47663/2018 · 2025-07-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010983862018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47663/2018 Between: 1. R. NARAYANA,, S/O SUBBARAYUDU, 50 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O AT KOTHAPALLI, KASIREDDYPALLI (V), RAMAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, PULIVENDULA, YSR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMAPURAM PS, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. P SUMATHI, W/O CHINNA OBULESU, GUVVALACHERUVU HARIJANAWADA, RAMAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in including the name of the petitioner as A.7 in Cr. No. 301 of 2018 of Ramapuram PS of YSR Kadapa District, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Arts. 14, 19 and 21 2 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to drop all further proceedings and quash the FIR so far as it relates to the petitioner in Cr. No. 301 of 2018 of Ramapuram PS of YSR Kadapa District forthwith, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings, including arrest of the petitioner in Cr. No. 301 of 2013 of Ramapuram PS of YSR Kadapa District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M S P KAMARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in including the name of the petitioner as A.7 in Cr. No. 301 of 2018 of Ramapuram PS of YSR Kadapa District, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to drop all further proceedings and quash the FIR so far as it relates to the petitioner in Cr. No. 301 of 2018 of Ramapuram PS of YSR Kadapa District forthwith, and pass..…” 2. Heard Sri MSP Kamaraju, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 178 W.P.No.47663 of 2018 Dated.25.07.2025 MH