APHC011001532017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 40702/2017 Between: 1. YADLAPALLI CHINNA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O GANGA RAJU,AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,VEERAMPALAM VILLAGE,SAGIPADU POST,KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE),STATE SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE,GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, KAMAVARAPUKOTA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, KAMAVARAPUKOTA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. PONNURI SATYAM, S/O TIRUPATHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, VEERAMPALAM VILLAGE, SAGIPADU POST,KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in interfering with the petitioner land in Survey No.'s 1330/4, 1330/6 & 1329/1 of Veerampalam Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, West 2 Godavari District is illegal, arbitrary, Contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act 1923 and violative of Article 14, 21 & 300 A of Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 50544 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere with the petitioner land in Survey No.'s 1330/4, 1330/6 & 1329/1 of Veerampalam Wage, Kamavarapukota Mandal, West Godavari District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if so advised. Permission is granted. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J SNI 3 118 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.40702 of 2017 Date: 07.02.2025 SNI