- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41565 WP No. 20195 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 20195 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN: D. M. SHANKARE GOWDA AGED 59 YEARS S/O MOGANNA GOWDA VALAMBIGA VILLAGE SINGAPURA POST KASABA HOBLI HOLE NARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE SRI. M.T. NANAIAH, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR CANE DEVELOMENT AND DIRECTOR OF SUGAR UNDERTAKING GOVT, KHB BUILDING F BLOCK, CBAB COMPLEX 5TH FLOOR KAVERI BHAVAN Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41565 WP No. 20195 of 2022 K G ROAD BANGALORE 560009 3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES KARNATAKA STATE NO 1, ALI ASKAR ROAD BANGLAORE 560051 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HEMAVATHI SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARAKHANE NIYAMITA SRINIVASAPURA CHANANRAYAPATNA TQ HASSAN DIST. 573116 5. THE GENERAL MANAGER CHAMUNDESHWARI SUGAR FACTORY PVT. LTD. SRINIVASAPURA CHANNARAYAPATNA TQ HASSAN DIST. 573116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. S. RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R4 SRI. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO R2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09.11.2021, 08.02.2022 I.E ANNEXURE-A AND B. DIRECT AND ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE R1, 2 AND 3 TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 03.04.2017 IN APPEAL NO.298/2012 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE WITHOUT ANY ALTERATION AND MODIFICATIONS I.E., ANNEXURE-D AND DIRECT THE R1, 2 AND 3 TO INITIATE NECESSARY LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST THE R4 FOR HIS MISCONDUCT AND FOR VIOLATION OF THE ORDERS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41565 WP No. 20195 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 09.11.2021, 08.02.2022 vide Annexures-A and B and issue directions against respondents No.1 to 3 to implement the order dated 03.04.2017 of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru ('Tribunal' for short) in Appeal No.298/2012. 2. Respondent No.4 filed a statement of objections contending that, the order passed by the Tribunal in Appeal No.298/2012 is complied with vide Annexures-K and M. 3. As the respondents have already complied with the order passed in Appeal No.298/2012, in view of the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41565 WP No. 20195 of 2022 same, nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38