Shaik Mahaboob Basha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/46794/2018 · 2025-01-03
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39761 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39761 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010968452018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368]
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 46794/2018
Between:
1. SHAIK MAHABOOB BASHA, S/O. HUSSAIN PEERA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF 2-211, KHADERPALLY VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, II TOWN PS, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN PS, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN PS, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
S DUSHYANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.46794 OF 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in harassing the petitioner by calling him to the police station without any reason as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to call the petitioner to the police station without any reason …”
2. Sri S.Dushyanth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4
4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
03.01.2025. psk
5
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
32
WRIT PETITION No:46794 OF 2018
Date: 03.01.2025
w psk