RAJIB CHETRY v. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 4 OTHERS
C.APPLN/818/2025 · 2026-09-11
Rajesh Mazumdar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3976 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3976 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043872025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/818/2025 RAJIB CHETRY SRI DAMBAR BAHADUR CHETRI, R/O. VILL.-SHANTIPUR, P/O. DUDHNOI, P/S. DUDHNOI, DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM-783124. VERSUS THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 4 OTHERS BONGAIGAON DIVISION, P/O. AND P/S. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM.
2:M/S/ HORIZON MARKETING CHANDMARI KOHIMA NAGALAND PIN-797001.
3:RUPAK KOCHARI S/O. JIBAN KOCHARI R/O. VILL.- SADIALGAON P/O. BARUAJAN P/S. BORHOLA DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN-785630.
4:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
BONGAIGAON DIVISION P/O. AND P/S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3 5:CHANDRA BAHADUR CHETRI S/O. LT. KHARGA BAHADUR CHETRI R/O. VILL.- SHANTIPUR P/O. AND P/S. DUDHNOI DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783124 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A LAL, MR A BRAHMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR TAPOBRAT CHHETRI (R-5), S K BEGUM(R-1),MS. M CHOUDHURY(R-1),MR SISHIR DUTTA (R-1),MS L SHARMA (R-4),MR D BARMAN(R-5),MR.
A GANGULY(R-5)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 12.09.2026
The claimant, Sri Rajib Chetry before the Tribunal/appellant in this appeal is present along with Mr. A. Brahma, learned counsel. Ms. Hena Haflongbar representative of the New India Assurance Company Limited is also present. It has been submitted that the parties have come to a settlement at a consolidated amount of Rs.3,60,000/-, against the awarded sum of Rs.1,75,076/- Since the parties have come to a settlement, the appeal can be closed. Accordingly, the claimants shall now furnish the details of the bank account where the settled amount is required to be deposited. On such furnishing of the details, the Insurer shall deposit the settled amount to the bank account. The MAC Appeal was yet to be registered since the condonation of delay
Page No.# 3/3 in preferring the appeal was yet to be allowed. However, in view of the settlement arrived at, the I.A. application praying for condonation of delay is closed. The connected appeal filing No. 2559/2025 would not be required to be processed by the Registry.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant