1 APHC010987822018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 48026/2018 Between: 1. SK. HUSSAIN BASHA, S/O. SHAIK HUSSAIN VALI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, OFFICE AT GENPACT INDIA, 1445 IDA UPPAL, OPP. NGRI, HUBSIGUDA, UPPAL - 500 039 RANGA REDDY DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JANGALAPALLI POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SMT VALLISABGARI MAHABOOB PYARI, D/O. VALLASABGARI HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. H. NO. 1/121, JANGALAPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in threatening the petitioner for compromise with the 4th respondent on the complaints to be given by the 4th respondent and her henchmen against the petitioner is null and void and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner upon the complaint may likely to be given by the 4th respondent and her henchmen against the petitioner with the allegations mentioned in the affidavit and to pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner upon the complaint may likely to be given by the 4th respondent and her henchmen against the petitioner with the allegations mentioned in the affidavit, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G M SWAMULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri G.M.Swamulu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 is in attendance. 3 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 4 125 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 48026/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 ARR