APHC010981062018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47467/2018 Between: 1. SMT. K. VIMALA, W/O. PAMCHALI, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR PLANT ATTENDANT (UNDER SUSPENSION), O/O. CHIEF ENGINEER (O AND M), DR. NTTPS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, R/O. D.NO.5-59, OPP. MRO OFFICE, IBRAHIMPATNA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER O AND M, APGENCO, DR. NTTPS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, APGENCO, DR. NTTPS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2 5. THE PERSONNEL OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU, STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.47467 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash impugned Memo No.CEE/O and M/Dr.NTTPS/Adm/C.8/F.CF/D,No.1276/2018 dated 17-05-2018, issued by the 3rd respondent, being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri N.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 07.08.2025 Pmk 4 04 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:47467 OF 2018 Date: 07.08.2025 Pmk