Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39753 (AP)

Jami Suresh Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/47771/2018 · 2025-08-20

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010986912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47771/2018 Between: 1. JAMI SURESH KUMAR, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC . BUSINESS, RIO. PLOT NO. 302, DOOR NO. 29-9-3, MADHUVONE TOWERS, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMAVARATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TEKKALI POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.47771 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the investigation done by the 3rdd respondent-Police in Cr.No.158/2016 on the file of Tekkali Police which was numbered as C.C.No.6/2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Tekkali, is improper and illegal and consequently direct the 3rd respondent-Police to reinvestigate the matter afresh, and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21.08.2025 Pmk 3 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:47771 OF 2018 Date: 21.08.2025 Pmk