HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9464 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Arbaj Khan, holding brief of Sri Parvez Iqbal Ansari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashish Kumar Tripathi, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 1651 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No. 453 of 2017 (State vs. Firoz Ahmad @ Bablu, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 506, 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, District Mau as well as the chargesheet dated 11.2.2018 and cognizance order dated 2.4.2018 passed by the CJM, Mau on the basis of the compromise dated 6.2.2024. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same has been filed along with supplementary affidavit which is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parvez Iqbal Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Firoz Ahmad Alias Bablu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 1651 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No. 453 of 2017 (State vs. Firoz Ahmad @ Bablu, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 506, 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, District Mau as well as the chargesheet dated 11.2.2018 and cognizance order dated 2.4.2018 passed by the CJM, Mau on the basis of the compromise dated 6.2.2024 are hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 23, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 9464 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad