1 APHC010993762018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 48029/2018 Between: 1. PAILA SURESH, S/O. KASAYYA, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. URGAM VILLAGE, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE O F ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARASANNAPET CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLAKI POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SRI B APPA RAO, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLAKI POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly on in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent herein in considering the representation dated 16.10.2018 with regard to addition of section of law in crime No. 82/2018 dated 31.07.2018, registered on the file of the 5th respondent police station and not conducting the investigation in proper and transparent manner by the respondents 4 to 6 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 to conduct investigation in proper and transparent manner by considering the representation dated 16.10.2018 in connection with crime No. 82/2018 registered on the file of the 5th respondent police station, by adding sections 307 and 392 IPC to the said crime, and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to conduct investigation in proper and transparent manner by adding sections 307 and 392 IPC in crime No. 82/2018 registered on the file of the 5th respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri P.Sankara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 3 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 is in attendance. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 4 123 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 48029/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 ARR