CWP-9464-2020 (O&M) 115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Padamjit Singh Chandigarh Administration and others CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Additional Standing Counsel for Mr. Sahil Pwar, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate and Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8. Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aakash Sharma, A Mr. R.S. Che Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advocate Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Prince Bharol, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Advocate for the respondent SUDHIR SINGH Present petition has been filed the nature of Mandamus directing regarding transfer/mutation of 50% 2020 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Padamjit Singh versus Chandigarh Administration and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Anandeshwar Gautam, Advocate for Mr. Sumeet Jain, Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent – U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Sahil Pwar, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate and Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8. Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aakash Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.9. Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advocate, Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Prince Bharol, Advocate for respondent No.10. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Advocate for the respondent ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. Present petition has been filed, inter alia the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to maintain regarding transfer/mutation of 50% share in the property i.e., House No.17, 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9464-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28, 2025 .….Petitioner …. Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Additional Standing Counsel U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Sahil Pwar, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate and Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8. Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with dvocate for respondent No.9. ema, Senior Advocate with respondent No.10. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Advocate for the respondent – CBI. inter alia, for issuance of a writ in the respondents to maintain status quo the property i.e., House No.17, 2 Petitioner s for issuance of a writ in status quo the property i.e., House No.17, MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.29 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-9464-2020 (O&M) 2 of 2 Sector 5-A, Chandigarh in the name of any third-party detrimental to the interest of the petitioner, who had inherited his share through his father. 2. Perusal of the case file shows that in pursuance to the order dated 30.10.2020 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the matter has already been taken up by the CBI, and after registration of the FIR by the CBI, challan has also been submitted in the Court and further proceedings are going on. 3. As the criminal Court has already taken cognizance, this Court finds no reason to keep the present petition pending and as a matter of fact, no further orders are called for. The same is accordingly, disposed of. However, it will be open to the parties to avail their legal remedies. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE April 28, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.29 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment