Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39749 (AP)

Jami Suresh Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/47966/2018 · 2025-07-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010986962018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47966/2018 Between: 1. JAMI SURESH KUMAR,, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS. (BOTH ARE R/O. PLOT NO. 302, DOOR NO. 29-9-3, MADHUVONE TOWERS, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT). 2. JAMI NAGESWARAMMA,, W/O SURESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE. (BOTH ARE R/O. PLOT NO. 302, DOOR NO. 29-9-3, MADHUVONE TOWERS, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMAVARATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the investigation done by the 3rd respondent- Police in Cr.No. 115/2015 on the file of Anakapalli Town Police which was numbered as C.C.No. 624/2017on the file of 5th Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli is improper and illegal and consequently direct the 3rd respondent- Police to re investigate the matter afresh, and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 624/2017 on the file of 5th Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: None represented for the petitioners. 2. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent-police to re-investigate the matter afresh in C.C.No.624 of 2016 relating to Crime No.115 of 2015. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 3 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before the trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 4 245 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47966/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 ARR