1 2025:CGHC:41610 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1008 of 2025 Lashpal Singh Rajput S/o Late Shyam Singh Rajput Aged About 32 Years R/o Near Bus Stand, Amapara, Ward No. 12, Balod, Tahsil And District Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Bhumika Thakur W/o Shri Lashpal Singh Rajput Aged About 26 Years R/o Adarsh Nagar, Mowa Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Yuwansh Rajput (Minor) Aged About 1 Month, Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Bhumika Thakur W/o Lashpal Singh Rajput, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Mowa Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Tarendra Kumar Jha, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 18.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Tarendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This Criminal Revision is being aggrieved of the judgment dated 31.07.2025 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, District – Raipur (C.G.) in MCC No. 1428/2024, whereby the learned Family Court, allowed the application for grant of interim maintenance, and ordered the applicant/husband that he has to pay the interim maintenance at the rate of total Rs. 10,000/- per month to the respondents. 3. The facts, in brief, is that the respondent No.1 filed an application under Section 144 of B.N.S.S. seeking maintenance against the RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 husband/applicant. The case of the respondent No.1 is that her marriage with the applicant was soleminzed on 07.12.2023 at Raipur, District Raipur according to Hindu Right and Custom. Respondent No. 2 is children from the wedlock of the parties and residing with applicant/mother. After some time of marriage the husband doing cruelty to that she was second wife and not like the applicant/wife. When the wife became pregnant and her health was not good at that time the husband not care the wife neither taken her to hospital therefore the heath condition of wife became serious at that time mother of the wife came to the house of the husband and both husband wife came to the parental house of the wife. After 1 moth the husband returned his house without given information to the wife. the husband refuse to pay the medical expenses and other expenses to the wife. The husband is working as Credit Manager, AU Bank Raipur and earning 40-45 thousand salary per months. The wife has no source of income and the minor children is in her custody. 4. The applicant herein has filed the reply to the said application and has denied the averments raised by the respondent. The learned Family Court has recorded the statement of the parties. The witnesses were examined before the learned Family Court including the applicant and the respondent. The learned Family Court by passing the impugned order, has allowed the application filed by the respondents for grant of interim maintenance and directed the applicant to pay the interim maintenance to the tune of total Rs. 10,000/- per month to the respondents. Hence, this revision. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that impugned order passed by the learned Family Court, is contrary to the facts and 3 evidence available on record. It is further submitted that the learned Family Court committed an illegality in granting Rs. 10,000/- per month interim maintenance to the respondents looking to the liability and different loan taken by the applicant, the award of the interim maintenance is too higher against the applicant. Therefore, the impugned order is bad in law, perverse and erroneous, and the same it is liable to be set-aside/quashed. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant, perused the pleadings and documents appended thereto. 7. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, and from the perusal of the impugned order passed by the learned Family Court, it transpires that after hearing all the statements of the witnesses and perusing the evidence available on record, the learned Family Court has passed the impugned order and awarded interim maintenance to the respondents, and there is no any illegality and infirmity while passing the same which requires interference by this Court. 8. Accordingly, the criminal revision being devoid of merit is liable to be and is hereby rejected. 9. Let a certified copy of this order be transmitted to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar