IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 CWP-5274-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2025 Surinder Beniwal …Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.V. Chauhan, Advocate, and Mr. Binayjeet Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order of termination dated 23.03.1999, Annexure P-4. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, contends that the matter has been rendered infructuous since the petitioner was reinstated in service with effect from 04.09.2001, and the period of service with effect from the date of termination, i.e., from 23.03.1999 to 03.09.2001 has been counted as duty period vide order dated 21.01.2004. She also contends that the petitioner was later regularised with effect from 01.10.2003, and is working as Science Master in State cadre as of now. 3. Disposed of as such. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 13.01.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.01.16 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document