Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39740 (KAR)

SRI. GOVINDAPPA v. SRI. LAXMAPPA

WP/25302/2019 · 2025-11-04

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44711 WP No. 25302 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25302 OF 2019 (GM-CC) BETWEEN: SRI. GOVINDAPPA S/O. LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. NERANAHALLI, BETHAMANGALA HOBLI, K.G.F. TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.M. KISHORE KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. LAXMAPPA S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. NERANAHALLI, BETHAMANGALA HOBLI, K.G.F. TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 116. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE CHAIRMAN DISTRICT CASTE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR - 563 101. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44711 WP No. 25302 of 2019 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101. 5. THE TAHASILDAR K.G.F. TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 121. 6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL, KOLAR DIVISION - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R6; R1 - SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CASTE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TAHASILDAR NUMBERED AS RD0038198018942 VIDE ANNX-A AND ALL SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS ON THE BASIS OF SAMD CASTE CERTIFICATE AS ILLEGAL AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44711 WP No. 25302 of 2019 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is challenging the Caste Certificate issued by the competent Authority at Annexure-A to the Writ Petition. 3. Sri.C.Jagadish, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submitted that, the impugned order produced at Annexure-A is an appealable order under Section 4-B of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of appointment etc.) Act, 1990. 4. In that view of the matter, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach appropriate Forum, if so advised. Accordingly, Writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37