APHC010980912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47456/2018 Between: 1. GUNTAKA RAJA CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O GUNTAKA VEMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 8-176, OPP.SBI NUNNA VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NUNNA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. RAMIREDDY RAMIREDDY, S/O PEDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 3-110 RACHURU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 5. RAMIREDDY KAUSALYA, W/O RAMIREDDY RAMIREDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 35-39-6/, MERLAVARI STREET, NEAR INCOME TAX OFFICE TANUKU, W.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDIPARTHI V RATNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.47456 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein in not taking any action against the unofficial respondent Nos. 4 and 5 pursuant to the complaint dt.12.12.2018 inspite of the personal visits made by the petitioner, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to take action against the unofficial respondents in accordance with Law pursuant to the complaint dt.12.12.2018, and to grant and pass…” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 01.09.2025 Pmk 4 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:47456 OF 2018 Date: 01.09.2025 Pmk