Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010980762018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 47231/2018
Between:
1. A.HUSSAIN PEERA,, S/O SATTAR SAHEB, UC.1.- F AGED 55 YEARS, REVENUE INSPECTOR, MANDAL REVEUE OFFICE, DHARMAVARAM TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. CHITTOOR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE-II TOWN P.S, CHITTOOR.DISTRICT. 4. SMT POREDDY PUSPHALATHA, W/O P. SIDDAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, MOTUKUPALLE VILLAGE, KADIRI RURAL MANDAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. NOW R/O D.NO.10-59-1, KURUVANKA, NEAR INDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL, MADANA PALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly 3rd Respondent herein, by issuing the impugned notice dated, 28-11-2018, to the petitioner is illegal, vitiated, without jurisdiction, against the constitutional law, against the provisions of Administrative Law, against the Departmental procedure contemplated under Revenue laws consequently direct the respondent to set aside the impugned notice dated. 28-11-2018 issued by respondent No.3 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 not to interfere in the official duty of the petitioner by suspending the impugned notice dated, 28-11-2018, issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. INENI VENKATA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47231 of 2018 The Court made the following Order:
Sri Ineni Venkata Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 30.07.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 47231 of 2018
Date: 30.07.2025 PSA