APHC010986432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 948/2019 Between: 1. V SATYANARAYANA BABU, S/O. LATE RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, WORKING AS JUNIOR ASST. KALIDINDI POST AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ' VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR LE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE PRINCIPAL GOVT JUNIOR COLLEGE, KALIDINDI (POST AND MANDAL), KRISHNA DISTT'ICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ' order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the 5th respondent i.e., Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A.No, 5155 OF 2015 dated 28-09-2018 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 'to absorb in the 4th respondent college as Junior Assistant forth with from the year 11-04-2005 when this Hon'ble High Court granted interim direction to continue the applicant into service and IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order in O.A.No.5155 of 2015 dated 28-09-2018 passed by Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, Pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMALAKARA RAO BATHINA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: At the time of considering the matter, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online, that the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date:30.07.2025 Ksj