Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39731 (AP)

Pandara Boina Avulakka, v. Pandara Boina Bala Kondaiah,

CRP/7800/2018 · 2025-07-24

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010992792018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7800/2018 Between: 1. PANDARA BOINA AVULAKKA,, W/O. NADIPI KONDAIAH (DIED) 2. PANDARA BOINA NADIPI KONDAIAH,, S/O. NADIPI KONDAIAH, (DIED). 3. PANDARA BOINA SOMA KONDAIAH,, S/O. NADIPI KONDAIAH, AGED 57 YEARS. RIO. BOLLAVARAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. PANDARA BOINA POSAIAH,, S/O. NADIPI KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. R/O.76-100-3-5-E5, GEETHA NAGAR, BALLARI CHOW RASTHA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT -3. 5. KILARU KONDAMMA,, W/O. PEDDA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. R/O. BOLLAVARAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. PANDARA BOINA NAGAMMA,, W/O.PEDDA KONDAIAH, AGED 66 YEARS. R/O. BOLLAVARAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. PANDARA BOINA THIRUMALAIAH,, S/O. PEDDA KONDAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS. R/O. BOLLAVARAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. PANDARA BOINA VELUGONDAIAH @ KARRENNA,, S/O. PEDDA KONDAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O. 6943976Y HAV CLK (SD), P.V. KONDAIAH, 19-FAD, BANAR, JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN STATE- 342027. 2 9. PANDARABOINA BHU LAKSHMI,, W/O. LATE NADIPI KONDAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O. BOLLAVARAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 10. PANDARABOINA MADHU,, S/O. LATE NADIPI KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. BINNAGURI JAPAAIGURI DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL- 735 232. 11. PANDARABIONA HARI, , S/O. NADIPI KONDAIAH, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O. BOLLAVARAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DIST ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PANDARA BOINA BALA KONDAIAH, S/o. Nadiki Kondaiah, Aged about 64 years, R/o. Bollavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D BHASKAR YADAV Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V NITESH The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioners. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 25.07.2025 PNS