1 2025:CGHC:41377 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9585 of 2025 1 - Agnes Anand Das W/o Shri Anand Kumar Das Aged About 48 Years Posted As Lecturer At Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Manendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate of Public Instructions (D P I) Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director School Education Division, Surguja, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Jainab Vanak, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 18-08-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against her transfer order after declaring surplus Lecturer under the Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 25.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation and in turn the Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted a Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification dated 08.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil