APHC010978552018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47157/2018 Between: 1. NARADASU LAKSHMANA RAO, S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, D.NO.23-11-101, R- AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM P.S. GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 5. KAKANI VENKATESWAR RAO, S/O. K. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RIO. PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.47157 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent herein in harassing the petitioner by calling him to the police station every day and making him to sit in the police station from morning to evening without any cause or concern, consequent to registration of Crime in F.I.R. No. 264/2017 dated 16.10.2017 and the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not acting on the complaint dated 23.11.2017 lodged by the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent herein not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station every day at the instance of the 5th respondent, consequent to registration of Crime in F.I.R. No. 264 of 2017, dated 16.10.2017 and pass…” 2. Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 4 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.01.2025. Pmk 5 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:47157 of 2018 Date:03.01.2025 Pmk