LPA-960-2025 (O&M) 109 (1st case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Pardeep The Presiding Officer CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. SUDHIR SINGH CM-2394-LPA Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Delay of 38 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Main case (O&M) At the outset, l cases bearing Industrial Tribunal cases have already been 07.05.2025. He further submits that the terms of the aforesaid decision 2. Disposed of in terms of 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. July 11, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA versus The Presiding Officer and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate for the ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) LPA-2025 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Delay of 38 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Main case (O&M) At the outset, learned counsel for the LPA No.571-2025 titled Balwan versus The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Rohtak and others already been dismissed by this Court vide judgment/order dated . He further submits that the present appeal may also be disposed of in the aforesaid decision. Disposed of in terms of LPA No.571 Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-960-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 11, 2025 ….Appellant ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the appellant. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Delay of 38 earned counsel for the appellant submits that similar Balwan versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Rohtak and others, and connected dismissed by this Court vide judgment/order dated present appeal may also be disposed of in LPA No.571-2025 (supra). Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 1 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Appellant s For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Delay of 38 similar Presiding Officer, , and connected dismissed by this Court vide judgment/order dated present appeal may also be disposed of in MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.16 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment