Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39722 (CHH)

KHILAWAN VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/1725/2025 · 2025-08-25

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43141-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1725 of 2025 1 - Khilawan Verma S/o Sadraram Verma Aged About 52 Years In- Charge, M/s Mohanam Big Bazaar, Near Hotel Green Park, Jamnipali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Mohanlal Jain Aged About 48 Years Director, M/s Mohanam Big Bazzar, Near Hotel Green Park, Jamnipali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Mohanlal Jain S/o L.K. Jain Aged About 64 Years Director, M/s Mohanam Big Bazaar, Near Hotel Green Park, Jamnipali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Gaurav Jain S/o Mohanlal Jain Aged About 42 Years Director, M/s Mohanam Big Bazaar, Near Hotel Green Park, Jamnipali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Food And Drugs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Food Safety Officer Food And Drug Administration Officer, Department of Food And Drugs, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.08.26 16:44:24 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 26.08. 2025 1. The matter has been listed in default as the appeal may not be maintainable, since the appellants have not challenged the impugned order before the Tribunal concerned and the relevant provisions of law have also not been mentioned in the cause title. 2. Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal, as the same is not maintainable before this Court. He further submits that the appellants may be granted liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the Tribunal concerned. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection and concurs with the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellants. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the instant appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellants to approach the Tribunal concerned in accordance with law. 5. Let the certified copy of the impugned order dated 04.06.2025 along with all annexures be returned to learned counsel for the appellants after keeping photocopies of the same on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu