22-WP-8457-2024.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8457 OF 2024 Vikrant Gulabrao Gaikwad … Petitioner Vs. Alka Gulabrao Ghorpade and Another … Respondents Mr. Dilip Bodake for the Petitioner. Ms. Ruchita Kadam a/w. Ms. Samiksha S. Mane for the Respondents. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 18th JUNE 2025 ORDER : 1. This petition is filed by the plaintiff to challenge order dated 17th January 2024 rejecting his application for amendment to the plaint. The application was filed after the evidence of the plaintiff was recorded. Hence, the application is rejected. 2. The impugned order is purely an interlocutory order. Normally, the court should be slow in interfering with such interlocutory order. In view of Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) it will always be open for the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in an appeal, in the event the final decree is adverse to the petitioner. 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.06.21 00:21:18 +0200 22-WP-8457-2024.docx 3. Hence, this is not a case to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of the discretionary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. Subject to the aforesaid observations, and reserving the right under Section 105 of the CPC, the petition is dismissed. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2