VIJAY KUMAR MEENA S/O LATE SH. BAJRANG LAL MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15588/2025 · 2025-10-16
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39719 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39719 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42513] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15588/2025 Vijay Kumar Meena S/o Late Sh. Bajrang Lal Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o House No. 66, Brindavan Enclave Jaipur Road, Bikaner (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan Mr. Junaid Khan Mr. Bajrang Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 16/10/2025
1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred by petitioner Vijay Kumar Meena with following prayer:- (I) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby, action of the respondents, which denied to consider the petitioner for further selection process and declared as ineligible for interview to the post of Rajasthan State and Subordinate Services in pursuant to advertisement dated 28.06.2023, may kindly be declared as arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional. (ii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, thereof and thereby, may kindly be quashed and set aside the impugned letter/dated 15.09.2025 (Annexure-7) is issued by the respondent No.2. (iii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, thereof and thereby, the respondents may kindly be
[2025:RJ-JP:42513] (2 of 2) [CW-15588/2025]
directed to give appointment to the petitioner for the post of Rajasthan State and Subordinate Service, accordingly.”
2. The issues raised herein is about the benchmark disability as claimed by the petitioner. By order dated 09.10.2025 the petitioner has undergone medical examination by the AIIMS Jodhpur and a report is received to favor claim of the petitioner.
learned counsel for RPSC, Mr. M.F. Baig candidly admits that the benchmark disability of present petitioner is more than 40% and he is eligible to be considered for the category, which he has been applied. He also submits that under the order of this Hon’ble Court, the petitioner is permitted to participate in the interview process but result is withheld.
3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this Writ Petition is disposed of with direction to the RPSC to consider candidature of present petitioner on the basis of disability certificate issued by AIIMS, Jodhpur and considering the qualification as mandated in the advertisement. If petitioner fulfills the requisite qualification then his candidature may be considered in accordance with the order of merit issued by the RPSC. The RPSC is further directed to declare his results as soon as possible.
4. With aforesaid, the writ petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /27