Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39719 (CHH)

JANARDAN SINGH v. SMT. ARADHANA SINGH

CR/170/2024 · 2025-03-17

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12554 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 170 of 2024 1 - Janardan Singh S/o Late Shri Lakhan Singh Aged About 86 Years (Defendant No. 1) 2 - Arvind Singh @ Topeshwar Singh S/o Janardan Singh, presently Aged About 58 Years Both R/o Village Bendarchi, Post Chilphi, Thana Saja, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. Present Address- Luchki Para, Near Shivmandir, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No. 2) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Aradhana Singh W/o Sanjay Kumar Rajput, presently Aged About 47 Years R/o Pachri Para, Ward No. 28, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff) 2 - Smt. Archana Singh W/o Baldau Singh, presently Aged About 55 Years, R/o Narsingh Vihar, Katulboard, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No. 3) 3 - Smt. Vandana Singh W/o Vishwanath Singh, presently Aged About 52 Years R/o Hari Nagar, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No. 4) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No. 5) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Government Advocate SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2025.03.18 17:24:26 +0530 2 SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 17/03/2025 1. Heard. 2. This Revision is preferred against the impugned order dated 29.7.2024 passed in Civil Suit No.3-A/2023 by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Saja, District Bemetara (CG). 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that this Revision may be disposed of with liberty to the applicant to raise all the grounds before the trial Court as no proper preliminary issue has been framed. Further, the applicant may also also be granted liberty to file an appropriate application under Order 14 Rule 5 of the CPC before the trial Court. 4. In view of the above, the Revision is disposed of with the liberty prayed for. 5. It is made clear that if any such application is filed by the applicant, the same shall be decided by the concerned Court, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Shyna