Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39718 (CHH)

RAKESH RAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4649/2022 · 2025-07-23

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2025:CGHC:35880 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4649 of 2022 Rakesh Rai son of Shri Mani Ram Rai Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Chichgohra, Tehsil Marvahi, District : Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pendra Road, District : Gourela-Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Marvahi, District : Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department, Pendra Road Division, District : Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate For State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. Today the case is listed for mediation. However, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties the matter is heard finally. 2. By way of the petitioner, the petitioner is challenging the action of the respondent authorities on the ground that the land of the petitioner was acquired for construction of road from Marvahi to Shuni, however, the road is not being constructed as per the map ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.07.29 11:08:31 +0530 2 / 3 showing the land required for road, but the road is being constructed from the center of petitioner’s land i.e. Khasra No.74/2 and 74/1 and no compensation has been granted to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the report of the Revenue Inspector dated 27/01/2022 is Annexure P/3 which shows that the construction which is being made is different from the proposed land for construction, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation before the SDO and the SDO may be directed to decide the same within a specified time frame. 4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 6. The extracts of the Annexure P/3, which is the report of the RI dated 27/01/2022 is reproduced hereinbelow:- कार्याालर्या राजस्व निरीक्षक सिवी तहील& मरवाही सिजला&गौरेला&पेण्ड्रा& मरवाही ¼Nx½ कं माक @ @jk-fu- सिवी निांक&27@01@2022 प्रतित] श्रीमा अुनिवभागीर्या अति"कारी (¼jk½ अुनिवभाग&मरवाही निवषर्याः भू- अज के ंबं" में जॉच प्रतितवे प्रस्तुत करे बावत्। 3 / 3 निवषर्याान्तगत लेख है निक ग्राम चिंचचगोहा प-ह--&30 रानिम & सिवी तहील मरवाही के आवेक राके श रार्या निपता मीराम जातित- कलार निवाी- चिंचचगोहा के स्वानिमत्व की भूनिम ग्राम चिंचचगोहा स्थिस्7त भूनिम खरा म्बर 74@2 रकबा 0-910 भूनिम में सिवी मरवाही माग का निमाण निकर्याा जा रहा है। इ ंबं" में मौका जाँच निकर्याा गर्याा। मौके में आवेनित भूनिम में े ही माग के चौडीकरण का कार्या निकर्याा जा रहा है। वतमा राजस्व रिरकाड व चालू क्शे का निमला निकर्याा गर्याा। ा7 ही भू& अज प्रकरण में ली गई ब्लू- प्रिंप्रट की म भी ली गई। ब्लू- प्रिंप्रट में अर्जिजत भूनिम के उत्तरी निशा में ग्रामीण पगडंडी को ही वतमा सिी- मरवाही माग ले ली गई 7ी जो निक वतमा निमाण े काफी अलग पार्याा गर्याा। आवेक के भूनिम में े पूव े होते हुए तिक्षणी निशा में डक जा रही है। आवेनित भूनिम खरा म्बर 74@2 में 132 मीटर × 18 मीटर कु ल भूनिम ¼0-024 gs-½ पर सिवी & मरवाही माग का निमाण निकर्याा जाा मौके पर पार्याा गर्याा] सिजे क्शा कल में लाल स्र्यााही े शार्याा गर्याा है। उपरोक्ताुार प्रतितवे ार ंप्रेनिषत। राजस्व निरीक्षक सिवी 7. In view of the above, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a representation before the concerned Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on such representation being filed, the said authority in turn shall decide the same within a period of 90 days from the date of filing of the representation. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu