APHC010977172018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 47283/2018 Between: 1. P.V. KRISHNA, S/O. VELAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, EX. DRIVER EMP.NO. 750130, MADDIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL DEPOT, A.P.S.R.T.C., VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. R/O. 2-270, INDIRANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, APSRTC HOUSE, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STAND, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proc.No. M1/1 (52)/2016 VSP, dated 30-11-2017 issued by the 1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, highly excessive when compared with the charge and subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same and direct the respondents to take back the petitioner to duty as Driver with all consequential and attendant benefits including pay and allowances, continuity of service etc., and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J KONDA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) 2. 24315 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ...... to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proc.No.M1/1 (52)/2016 VSP, dated 30-11-2017 issued by the 1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, highly excessive when compared with the charge and subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same and direct the respondents to take back the petitioner to duty as Driver with all consequential and attendant benefits including pay and allowances, continuity of service etc., and pass ....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 47283 of 2018 02.07.2025 Mjl /*