Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39710 (RAJ)

HARDEVNATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLMP/4395/2016 · 2025-10-07

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4395/2016 Hardevnath S/o Shri Gulabnath, aged 64 years, R/o Jogiyo Ka Nadaa, Tehsil Kishangar, Distt. Ajmer ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through PP 2. S.H.O. Police Station Kishangar, Distt. Ajmer ----Non-petitioner 3. Shri Ajay Bafna S/o Shri Nemichand Bafna, age 45 years, R/o Bafna Sadan, Ravindra Rangmach Ke Pass, Madanganj, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/10/2025 1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the FIR No. 222/2016 dated 19.08.2016 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, Dist. Ajmer for offences under Sections 406, 420, 447, 427,379 and 120B IPC. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that bare perusal of the content of FIR would not constitute any criminal offence against the petitioner and the petitioner has been falsely implicated. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 22.09.2025 sent by SHO Police Station Kishangarh, Dist. Ajmer revealing therein that, investigation has been [2025:RJ-JP:40701] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4395/2016] conducted by the Investigating Officer and which has resulted in filing of charge-sheet against the petitioner under Sections 420, 406, 447, 427, & 120B IPC, which has been filed on 16.12.2019 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh, Dist. Ajmer. Thereafter, trial is pending against the petitioner and the next date in the trial is 13.11.2025. In the factual report, the criminal antecedents of the petitioner have also been given. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, where the police authorities have conducted investigation and after investigation, it has been found that prima facie offence is made out against the petitioner, charge-sheet has been filed and trial is pending before the concerned Court. 5. I do not find any ground to invoke inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 6. In view of above statement, criminal misc. petitioner is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /39