Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39710 (JHR)

MAX ALERT SYSTEM LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER v. UNION OF INDIA THRO ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE

WPC/1478/2024 · 2025-11-13

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33935-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1478 of 2024 ----- Max Alert System Ltd. through its Authorised Officer, CIN: L74999MH2004PLC 144034, Regd. Office at , 502, 5th Floor, Timmy Arcade, CTS No. 7788, Makwana Road, Marol Andheri, (East) Mumbai Maharasthra, 400059. ... … Petitioner Versus 1.Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Aliganj, Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi-110003. 2. Dy. Director General Forest (c), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Integrated Regional Office, Bunglow No. A-2, Shyamali Colony, Ranchi. 3. State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, 1st Floor, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Environment and Climate Change, Van Bhawan, Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, Township Administration Building, HEC Complex, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 6. District Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Jamtara, Distt. Jamtara, Jharkhand. 7.Member Secretary, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nirupama, Advocate For the Resp. No.7 : Mr. Bhanu Kumar, Advocate ------- Order No.07/Dated: 13th November, 2025 1. Mrs. Nirupama, the learned counsel has appeared for the petitioner and has submitted that she has no instruction in the matter. 2. Mr. Bhanu Kumar, the learned counsel has appeared for the respondent no.7, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Ranchi has submitted that the matter has become infructuous. 3. The present case has been filed on 15.3.2024 but still it is defective . 4. This court considering the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioner has no instruction in the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed due to want of instruction. 5. IA (s), if any, stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Date: 13.11.2025 KNR Uploaded on 14.11.2025