Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39710 (AP)

T. Venkata Ramana v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/47864/2018 · 2025-06-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010983012018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47864/2018 Between: 1. T. VENKATA RAMANA, S/O LATE RAMUNAIDU, AGED, 35 YEARS, OCC, FIELD ASSISTANT (REMOVED), R/O GANGACHOLLAPENTA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. R. KAMALA KUMARI, W/O APPANNA, AGED, 32 YEARS, OCC, FIELD ASSISTANT (REMOVED), R/O KOTHABAGGAM VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. COMMISSIONER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, CHARITASRI HOSPITAL, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMDISTRICT PROGRAMME, COORDINATOR OF MGNREGS, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT AT VIZIANAGARAM. 4. PROJECT DIRECTORCUMADDITIONAL DISTRICT, PROGRAMME COORDINATOR OF MGNREGS, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2 5. MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT, OFFICER-CUM-PROGRAMME OFFICER OF MGNREGS, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particUlarly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings in Rc. No. 1857/2015/EGS, dt. 04.12.2017 and 21.12.2017 passed by the 4th respondent thereby not renewed the petitioners contract of employment for the post of Field Assistants working in Gangachollapenta and Kothabagggam Gram Panchayats of Gajapathinagaram Mandal of Vizianagaram District and the recommendations of Three Men Committee as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, settled principles of service jurisprudence and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners into service for their said posts and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of impugned proceedings in Rc.No. 1857/2015/EGS, dt. 04.12.2017 and 21.12.2017 passed by the 4th respondent and consequently directs the Respondents 3 to 5 to reinstate the petitioners into service in the post of Field Assistants working in Gangachollapenta and Kothabagggam Gram Panchayats of Gajapathinagaram Mandal of Vizianagaram District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47864/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.1857/2015/EGS, dt.04.12.2017 and 21.12.2017 passed by the 4th respondent thereby not renewed the petitioners’ contract of employment for the post of Field Assistants working in Gangachollapenta and Kothabaggam Gram Panchayats of Gajapathinagaram Mandal of Vizianagaram District and the recommendations of Three Men Committee as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice settled principles of service jurisprudence and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners into service for their said posts and pass ..…” 2. Sri Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since the relief has become infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.06.2025 SCS 4 77 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.47864 of 2018 Dt.30.06.2025 SCS