Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39708 (AP)

Valmiki Rambabu v. The Station House Officer

WP/47761/2018 · 2025-09-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010982852018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47761/2018 Between: 1. VALMIKI RAMBABU, S/O VALMIKI LINGANNA, AGED. 24 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYED, R/O H.NO.5, SHAIKSANIPALLI , URAVAKONDA (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, A.P- 515812 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, URAVAKONDA POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, A.P 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR (DISTRICT), ANDHRA PRADESH -515801 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, OPP. SSBN COLLEGE HOSPITAL ROAD ANANTAPUR( DISTRICT), ANDHRA PRADESH- 515001 4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, BUCKINGHAMPETA, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME OF A.P. SECRETARIAT OF A.P. VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 2 6. MR M RANGASWAMY, S/O M. DURGANNA AGED . ABOUT 40 YEARS,R/O H.NO.1-3-194 , NEHRU COLONY, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, A.P- 515812 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus , declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not considering the complaint given by the Petitioner on dated 08-05-2018, as illegal , arbitrary , violation of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to investigate and register a FIR against Respondent No.6 to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the Respondent No.2 to 5 to consider the representation dated 25-06¬2018 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VOOSA RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47761 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that basing on the petitioner’s representation dated 08.05.2018, the Police registered a case in Crime No.92 of 2018 for the offence under Section 429 R/w 34 IPC. 3. The present Writ Petition is filed alleging that the respondent No.1 did not registered any case basing on the petitioner’s representation dated 05.08.2018. 4. In view of the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, nothing remains for further adjudication in the present Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 09.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47761 of 2018 Date: 09.09.2025 PSA