Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39705 (ALL)

ARCHANA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA529/869/2025 · 2025-04-15

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56154 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 869 of 2025 Applicant :- Archana Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Gupta,Mahesh Kumar Sahani,Narendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case No. 4667 of 2023 (State Vs. Anuj and others) arising out of Case Crime No.346 of 2023, under Sections 323, 506, 498-A IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali, District- Mainpuri, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court Mainpuri expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the aggrieved wife and opposite party nos. 2 to 4 are husband and her in-laws. The matter is pending since the year 2023 and even charges have not been framed so far whereas the accused persons have appeared before the court. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. The trial court is expected to take strict action against the accused persons, who are trying to delay the trial of this case and even charges have not been framed on account of their delaying tactics. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to pass an order on the point of framing of charge in this case as per law within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and if the charges are framed, the learned trial court shall make all the endeavours for the expeditious disposal of the case without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Shivangi Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad