Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39704 (AP)

V.Narasamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/47307/2018 · 2025-08-11

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010982432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47307/2018 Between: 1. V.NARASAMMA,, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE KONDA REDDY, R/O.D.NO.9/716, CHILAKALA BHAVI STREET, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. E.LAKSHMI DEVI,, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O.NAGESWARA REDDY, R/O.D.NO. 9/716, CHILAKALA BHAVI STREET, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.47307 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to writ order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to register a crime duly issuing FIR based on the complaint given by them on 10-5-2018 and investigate the same with regard to the suspicious death of V.Palakonda Reddy S/o.Late Konda Reddy by declaring the inaction of the respondents in not registering the crime based on their complaint as illegal and arbitrary and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri M.N.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.08.2025 Pmk 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:47307 OF 2018 Date: 12.08.2025 Pmk