Kolluru Mamatha Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/47181/2018 · 2025-08-12
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39703 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39703 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010970982018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 47181/2018 Between:
1. KOLLURU MAMATHA KUMARI, W/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED. 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD, R/O.REMALLE VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR HOME, SECRETARIAT , AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, HEAD QUARTER AT MACHILIPATNAM
3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NUZIVIDU, KRISHNA DISTRICT
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMANUJUNCTIN CIRCLE, KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. VEERAVALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT
6. MR Y V L NAIDU, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMANU JUNCTION CIRCLE, KRISHNA DISTRICT
7. MR MANDALA NAGA DURGARAO, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. VEERAVALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT
8. SAKINENI SRILATHA, W/O.RAGHUCHANDRA, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O. REMALLE VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
9. GOGINENI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.LAXMINARAYANA, AGED.50 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE CUM BUSNNESS, R/O. REMALLE VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNAN DISTRICT
2
10. G PRASAD, S/O.RAMARAO, AGED.55 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE CUM BUSNNESS, R/O. REMALLE VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNAN DISTRICT
11. YANAMADALA SAMBASHIVA RAO, AGED.PICHHAIAH, AGED. 60 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE CUM BUSNNESS, R/O. REMALLE VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNAN DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondent Nos.2,3 and 5 in not taking action on the petitioner's report dt. 05.12.2018 which was sent to the Respondent Nos.
2, 3 and 5 through the registered post seeking to take proper and appropriate action against the Respondent Nos.6-11 for torturing the petitioner's husband for five days threatening the petitioner, her son and her brother-in-law stating that they would involve them in criminal cases and forced the petitioner to execute an agreement of sale in favour of Sakineni Srilatha for the land to an extent of Ac.0.65 cents comprised in Sy.No.45/2 of Remalle village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and for other reliefs and violation of Article 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2-5 to take steps on the petitioners report date 05-12-2018 and pass appropriate orders, and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the Respondent Nos 2 - 5 take steps on the petitioner report dated 05-12-2018 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PULLA RAO YELLANKI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 47181 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 30.07.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that basing on the petitioner’s report, the Police registered a case in Crime No.225 of 2018 on the file of Veeravalli Police Station and hence, nothing remains for further adjudication in the present Writ Petition. 3. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 47181 of 2018
Date: 13.08.2025 PSA