1 APHC010990302018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47680/2018 Between: 1. NALLAMALLI VENKATA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O MADANURU POST, KOTHAPATNAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, INKOLLU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. MR AJAY KUMAR, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, J PANGULURU POLICE STATION, RENINGAVARAM PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in interfering into the civil disputes, calling the petitioner to the police station, threatening them to settle the civil disputes as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 5th respondents police not to threaten and call the petitioner to the police station to settle the civil disputes, pending disposal of the writ petition pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that 5th respondent is calling the petitioner to the police station and insisting him to settle the civil disputes. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the 5th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the 5th respondent is not interfering in the civil disputes. 3 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 5th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 4 247 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47680/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 ARR