Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3969 (PAT)

Shivam Saurav v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/20092/2025 · 2026-03-12

A Abhishek Reddy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20092 of 2025 ====================================================== Shivam Saurav S/o Ranvir Kumar Mishra, R/o Bazidpur Kusahi, Kumar Bajitpur, PS- Patepur, District- Vaishali, Bihar-843110. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar. 2. Reserve Bank of India, through its Regional Director, Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 3. State Bank of India, having its registered office at State Bank Bhawan, MC Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Maharashtra through its Chairman. 4. State Bank of India, having its branch office at Malpur Sab, Vaishali, Bihar, through its Branch Manager. 5. Bank of India, having its registered office at Star House, C-5, G Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051, through its Managing Director and CEO. 6. Bank of India, having its branch office at Bajitpur, Vaishali, Bihar, through its Branch Manager. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dayanand Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (6). For the Bank of India : Mr. Ravish Mishra, Advocate. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 3 12-03-2026 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 29.01.2026, the Respondent-Bank has defreezed the account of the petitioner and he has being allowed to operate the same. Learned counsel submits that the authority has put a lien over an Patna High Court CWJC No.20092 of 2025(3) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 amount of Rs. 2000/- which is subject matter of the Cyber Crime reported by the State Cyber Cell, CID Crime, Gandhinagar, Gujarat and he has no objection, if the lien continues over the said amount. 2. Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-authority to permit the petitioner to operate the account by continuing the lien over a sum of Rs. 2000/-, the lien is subject to the final out come of the Cyber Crime involved in the present case. 3. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. shakir/- (A. Abhishek Reddy, J) U