Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39689 (AP)

M. Raghavendra v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/47330/2018 · 2025-07-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010978092018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47330/2018 Between: 1. M. RAGHAVENDRA, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC. WELDER, R/O. D.NO.4-2B13, BANDAGURRAPPA VEEDHI, BUKKAPATNAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI POLICE STATION, PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUTTAPARTHI POLICE STATION, PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of the Respondents 5 and 6 in not taking any further action in pursuant to the petitioners complaint Dt.28.10.2018 for registration of crime and also investigation as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to initiate appropriate action by registering crime in pursuant to the petitioners complaint Dt.28.10.2018 and to pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to initiate appropriate action by registering crime in pursuant to the petitioner's complaint Dt.28.10.2018 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that crime is registered as F.I.R.No.71 of 2019 and after investigation, it is referred as “mistake of fact” and recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 4 226 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47330/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 ARR