1 APHC010983342018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47502/2018 Between: 1. BHEEMUNIPATNAM MUTUALLY AIDED COOP BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.,, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY SRI V.VIJAYA KUMAR S/O LATE V.JACHARAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC.SECRETARY, R/O DOOR NO. 45-58-7/5/3, FLAT NO. 104, SAMPATH ARCADE, NARASIMHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT.) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, VUDA SHOPPING COMPLEX, MVP COLONY, OPP. SAMATA COLLEGE, VISAKHAPATNAM- 17 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT, AT D.NO.49-53-20/30, GREEN PARK COLONY, BALAYYA SASTRI LAYOUT, SEETHAMMADARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that 2nd and 3rd Respondents have no jurisdiction or authority to enquire into the affairs of the Petitioner society and cannot compel the Petitioner to furnish information or conduct any enquiry in relation to its affairs and quash the notice dated 28-11-2018 and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the day to day activities of the Petitioners Society by suspending the Communication dated 28-11-2018 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 2 to 4 is in attendance. 3 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 ARR 4 106 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47502/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 ARR