Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39685 (RAJ)

RAHUL KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMAVTAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11233/2025 · 2025-10-08

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40887] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11233/2025 Rahul Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramavtar Sharma, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dhani Daruka Wali, Tan Lakhani, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur Rural (Rajasthan) At Present Plot No. 27, Durga Vihar B Nagal Jesa Bohra, Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur City, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 08/10/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.75/2025 registered at Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Section(s) 189(2), 115(2) & 307 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed, after completion of investigation. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:40887] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11233/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perused the material available on record the accused- petitioner has been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Rahul Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramavtar Sharma is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /122