Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35493-DB WPHC No. 94 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION HABEAS CORPUS NO. 94 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SMT. TEJASWINI W/O MANJUNATH C.N.
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT. CHAMMANAHALLI MALIYUR POST, BANNUR TOWN T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.G. SREENIVASA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001
2.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU
3.
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE T. NARASIPURA (T) MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35493-DB WPHC No. 94 of 2025
4.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE BANNUR POLICE STATION MYSURU DISTRICT
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIYAPPA, SPP-I A/W.
SRI. THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
MANJUNATH C.N.
S/O NANJUNDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT CHAMMANAHALLI MALIYUR POST BANNUR TOWN T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 101
…DETENUE
THIS WP(HC) IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE PETITIONER, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS TO TRACE AND PRODUCE THE DETENUE BEFORE THE JURISDICTION COURT AND SET AT LIBERTY AND QUASH THE ILLEGAL DETENTION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35493-DB WPHC No. 94 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
This writ petition is filed with ten office objections including the non-furnishing of the second set of the petition memo and non-payment of Court fee.
2. The learned Special Public Prosecutor would submit that a crime has been registered as against the alleged detenue and that the alleged detenue is under remand in the said crime. In the above view of the matter, nothing survives for
consideration. The writ petition therefore fails, the same is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
RAK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3