Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39679 (AP)

Sankya Venkata Laxmi v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/46734/2018 · 2025-08-12

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010968172018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46734/2018 Between: 1. SANKYA VENKATA LAXMI, W/O. VENKATESHWARULU, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BHARATH NAGAR, NEAR SRINIVAS THEATER, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 5. THE S H O CUM CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLETALUQ P.S., PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 6. GANGA VENKATESHWARULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUQ P.S., PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 7. JILAKARA PUNNAIAH, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC, NIL, R/O. PULIVENKATA REDDY COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 8. BATHULA MARIYAMMA, W/O. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC, NIL, R/O. 2ND LANE, INDRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 2 9. CHITTI CHAKRAVARTHI, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC, NILL, R/O. 2ND LANE, INDRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 10. SHAIK MOHAMMED BHUJJI, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC, NILL, R/O. 2ND LANE, INDRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No. 4 in not registering the crime against the 6th respondent who has committed rape on the petitioner on the intervened night of 1/2-12-2018 at plots situated in Indramma Colony, Ongole, Prakasham District, though report was given on 02-12-2018, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd and 4th respondents to take action against the 6th respondent who had committed rape on petitioner forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to register a crime immediate upon the report given by the petitioner on 02-12-2018, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46734 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri B.Surya Chandra, learned counsel representing Sri N.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, by stating that the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46734 of 2018 Date: 13.08.2025 PSA