- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32876 WP No. 4169 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 4169 OF 2021 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. S AHALYA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS W/O SHANKAR RAO SHOP NO.04, CORPORATION BUILDING KALIDASA ROAD, V V MOHALLA MYSURU-570002. 2. SMT. KAMALESH AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS W/O REVATHI VIJAYAPRAKASH SHOP NO.01-02-03, CORPORATION BUILDING KALIDASA ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA MYSURU-570002. 3. SMT. SHOBHA G S AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR SHOP NO.02, CORPORATION BUILDING KALIDAA ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA MYSORE-570002. 4. M. KRISHNAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE N ASHWATH SHOP NO.12S12 VISVESWARAYA BHAVAN K.R. CIRCLE, MYSURU-570001. 5. Y.C. PUTTANAIAH Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32876 WP No. 4169 of 2021 AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LATE Y R CHIKKAVEERAPPA SHOP NO.22, VISVESWARAYA BHAVAN K.R. CIRCLE MYSURU-570001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B S NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M S BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE MYSURU CITY-MYSURU-570001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. HEMANTH P., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. M.P. GEETHADEVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICES DATED 20.11.2020 AND 19.01.2021 MADE IN REF.NO.R8(2)PR/255/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE R-2 MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, COPIES AT ANNEXURE-A TO A4 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32876 WP No. 4169 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed, challenging the notices issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the petitioners to vacate their shops. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 upon instructions submits that the shops admittedly belong to respondent No.2 - the Mysuru Mahanagara Palike. However, the notices have been issued erroneously and hence, subsequently, the same have been withdrawn and appropriate proceedings under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 have been initiated to have the petitioners evicted from the property. 3. It is seen that the writ petition pertains to issuance of impugned notices and nothing else. As the same has been withdrawn, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32876 WP No. 4169 of 2021 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20