[2025:RJ-JP:41731-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc 2nd Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1899/2025 IN D. B. Criminal Appeal No. 33/2022 Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Ran Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ganwadi Jat , Police Station, Nagal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh (Haryana) (At Present Confined In Central Jail At Bikaner) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Addl. GA Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Addl. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. This second suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused- applicant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of IPC. 3. Counsel further submits that he has annexed certificate under Section 311(3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that the accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter. Counsel further submits that the applicant was on bail during trial and has served the sentence for more than five years. Counsel also submits that complainant- father and brother of the deceased have turned hostile. Counsel [2025:RJ-JP:41731-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1899/2025] further submits that sentence of co-accused, namely, Kapil has already been suspended by the Court. Counsel further submits that hearing of the appeal may take longtime, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate has opposed the second application for suspension of sentence. 5. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering that complainant-father and brother of the deceased have turned hostile; that sentence of the co-accused has already been suspended by the Court; that applicant was on bail during trial; looking to the custody period and also considering that hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this application for suspension of sentence. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal misc. second suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant-Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Ran Singh, shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal and the appellant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 17.11.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial court through email/fax for necessary compliance. (SAMEER JAIN),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Deepak/ Pooja /7