Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010968052018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 46719/2018
Between:
1. PANDUGA UDAYASREE, W/O P. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSC WIFE, RESIDENT OF BANDAGONDA VILLAGE, NARAYANAPET MANDAL, MANABOOBNAGAR DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner husband Panduga Narayana Reddy S/o Papi Reddy, Convict Prisoner No.4083, who is in Central Prison, Kadapa for giving consent of
2 the State of Telangana to stay the petitioners husband Narayana Reddy at his native place i.e., Bandagonda village, Narayanapet Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider the case of Panduga Narayana Reddy S/o Papi Reddy, Convict Prisoner No.4083, who is in Central Prison, Kadapa to give consent of the State of Telangana to the petitioners husband Panduga Narayana Reddy, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (TG)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46719 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri D.Kodandarami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 46719 of 2018
Date: 13.08.2025 PSA