Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39672 (AP)

A.Nagendra v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/47006/2018 · 2025-07-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010964102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47006/2018 Between: 1. A.NAGENDRA, S/O. OBULESH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM POST AND DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLEINSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM RURAL POLICE STATION, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner unnecessarily, Without showing any proper reason to the Police Station and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the illegal and unnecessary harassment to the petitioner by the respondents pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G UMAPATHI SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 47006/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner unnecessarily, Without showing any proper reason to the Police Station and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G. Umapathi Sastry, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition was filed seeking a direction to the Police not to call the petitioner to the Police Station. Learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner is no more, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.47006 of 2018 Dated.23.07.2025 UPS 145