- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6491 WP No. 101313 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 101313 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: P. B. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O. LATE RANGASWAMY AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. S.BASAPURA VILLAGE, TQ. SANDUR, DIST. BALLARI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. V. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 01 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELLARI, DIST. BELLARI -583101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BELLARI, DIST: BELLARI. 4. THE TAHASILDAR SANDUR, DIST. BELLARI-583101. 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, TORANAGALLU, Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6491 WP No. 101313 of 2024 DIST. BELLARI-583101. 6. SRI. DEVENDRAPPA S/O. P. ANJINAPPA, AGE. YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. S. BASAPURA VILLAGE, TQ. SANDUR, DIST. BELLARI-583101. 7. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO. 3, NEAR SBI BANK, KUREKUPPA VILLAGE, TQ. SANDUR AND DIST. BELLARI- 583101. …RESPONDENTS (BY KUMARI GAYATRI. S.R, ADVOCATE FOR R7; SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. VINAYKUMAR BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 DATED 17.01.2024 BEARING RP/63/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN REV/APPEAL NO/374/2022-23 DATED 29.08.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-B RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6491 WP No. 101313 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. 2. The order sheet dated 15.04.2025 reads as under: “Learned counsel for respondent once again submits that the petitioners have not challenged the order of the Land Tribunal, granting occupancy right in favour of the tenants. Petitioners are challenging only mutation entry, which was certified on the basis of the registered sale deed executed by respondent No.6, which is not permissible under law. A similar submission was made on the last date of hearing that is on 28.03.2025, in spite of that learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. However, to afford final opportunity, list this matter on 16.04.2025.” - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6491 WP No. 101313 of 2024 3. In spite of that, there is no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner and hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE VB CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3