- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40593 WP No. 17218 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 17218 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT POORNIMA R W/O RAVICHANDRA N, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, MANAGER, CANARA BANK, MANDYA REGIONAL OFFICE, MANDYA-571401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHISHA D J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER CANARA BANK, NO.112, J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE-560002. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40593 WP No. 17218 of 2024 2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, HRM SECTION, BANGALORE CIRCLE OFFICE, BANGALORE-560002. 3. THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, HRM SECTION, KOZHIKODE CIRCLE OFFICE, KERALA-673005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T P MUTHANNA., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER REF HR./7593 2024 AGT 96190.1 DTD 01.06.24 AT ANNEXURE-E, ISSUED BY THE R1 . THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ******* CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40593 WP No. 17218 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash her transfer order dated 01.06.2024 vide Annexure 'E' passed by the 1st respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has submitted an application for grant of maternity leave and that the respondents have considered the application for sanction of maternity leave vide order dated 04.10.2025. As the respondents have already sanctioned the maternity leave to the petitioner, the learned counsel submits that, in view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition and the writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. 3. Submission is placed on record. 4. As the respondents have already considered the application and sanctioned the maternity leave to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40593 WP No. 17218 of 2024 the petitioner, in view of the same, nothing survives further for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration and are accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15