Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39663 (ALL)

RAJ VIKRAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/1116/2025 · 2025-07-27

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123894-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1116 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Vikram Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and 4 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shakti Shanker Tiwari, Subhash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Jagdish Pathak (S.C.), Shiv Prakash Gupta for J. N. Maurya, Gaurav Gautam Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and therefore, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Mukesh Pal/Sharad (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad