[2025:RJ-JP:47332] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17862/2025 Yogesh Kumar S/o Shri Banshi Lal Jailia, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 184, Ihs Colony, Bajriya Sawaimadhopur, District Sawai Madhopur. Presently Working On The Post Of Senior Lab Technician, Government Hospital, Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director (Administration) Health Service, Swasthya Medical And Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, respectfully therefore, prayed that by most an appropriate writ, order or direction - Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition direction and to may kantly given respondants to provide the entire service benefit to the petitiones on the post of Lab Technician provided similar situated persons and may be considered the case of the [2025:RJ-JP:47332] (2 of 3) [CW-17862/2025] petitioner in the light Of the judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 08.09.2020 8764/2020 decided title on as bearing the Suresh Kumar & Others Vs State of Rajasthan and others and S.B. Civil Writ Petition NO. 1685/2021 decided on 28.01.2021 at Principl Seat, Jodhpur titled as Kishnaram Karwasara Vs. State of Rajasthan and others.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 28.01.2021 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1685/2021 titled as Kishnaram Karwasara and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Prakhar Jain on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Kishnaram Karwasara and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order [2025:RJ-JP:47332] (3 of 3) [CW-17862/2025] within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /103